I read the sad news today in Media Post that Editor & Publisher is shutting its doors at the end of the year. The magazine is special to me on a number of levels, I started my career subletting office space from Editor & Publisher for Real Media focused on building value for local news digital sites. I read E&P religiously to stay apprised of what was happening among the print publishers. As an industry there are few remaining independent voices for publishers and I hope that someone can take up the torch and keep running with it.
1

I read the sad news today in Media Post that Editor & Publisher is shutting its doors at the end of the year. The magazine is special to me on a number of levels, I started my career subletting office space from Editor & Publisher for Real Media focused on building value for local news digital sites. I read E&P religiously to stay apprised of what was happening among the print publishers. As an industry there are few remaining independent voices for publishers and I hope that someone can take up the torch and keep running with it.
Read more
Editor and Publisher Shutting Down
Posted by
Lawrence Allen
Labels:
advertising,
Media,
publishers
I read the sad news today in Media Post that Editor & Publisher is shutting its doors at the end of the year. The magazine is special to me on a number of levels, I started my career subletting office space from Editor & Publisher for Real Media focused on building value for local news digital sites. I read E&P religiously to stay apprised of what was happening among the print publishers. As an industry there are few remaining independent voices for publishers and I hope that someone can take up the torch and keep running with it.
0

I was talking (emailing actually) about yesterday's post with a friend of mine who happens to be a finance wiz. My post on Friction reminded her of the changes that have occurred in stock trading over the last decade. When she started trading stocks they were still quoted in fractions. Then, they went to nickels at some point and by the time she left trading they were in pennies. One of the reasons the technology of rapid, quantitative, algorithmic trading has been growing by leaps and bounds is the loss of these spreads.
Now, so much of the trading is based on computer models and is done electronically. However, as a result, the profit margins have been reduced so greatly that LARGE volume must be done to make it worthwhile for a broker. When my friend was trading on the floor the avg payout on a single share of stock traded was $0.06 or $0.07. Now, this volume is done through programs electronically and the payouts are fractions of a cent.
This technology change has pushed out human brokers who still rely on the old fashioned way of trading out of the biz. Interestingly, she saw Jeff Zucker's comment "Analog dollars to digital pennies" through this lens. Technology provides huge advantages in costs & increasing production, but there are going to be some who are left out in the cold if they don't adapt in time. The benefactors change as tech changes.
I see this all the time when speaking with publishers. They conceptually want to adapt but they are afraid and the the people and organizations need to embrace the changes. A role inside the digital media organization that understands rapid change is Ad Operations this group has seen a massive shift from coding html on a page to serve an ad to now dynamically managing inventory across a frankenstein system of ad servers, order and yield management systems, data providers, rich media vendors, analytics, third-party ad networks and the list goes on. Digital media is looking more like the stock market every day and the trafficker is a lot like the broker of old, we now live in a data economy so the inventory analysts will run the business and those that are still hard coding ads to a page are long gone.
Read more
Media is reliving the past of Wall Street
Posted by
Lawrence Allen
Labels:
ad networks,
Media,
technlogy,
wall street
I was talking (emailing actually) about yesterday's post with a friend of mine who happens to be a finance wiz. My post on Friction reminded her of the changes that have occurred in stock trading over the last decade. When she started trading stocks they were still quoted in fractions. Then, they went to nickels at some point and by the time she left trading they were in pennies. One of the reasons the technology of rapid, quantitative, algorithmic trading has been growing by leaps and bounds is the loss of these spreads.
Now, so much of the trading is based on computer models and is done electronically. However, as a result, the profit margins have been reduced so greatly that LARGE volume must be done to make it worthwhile for a broker. When my friend was trading on the floor the avg payout on a single share of stock traded was $0.06 or $0.07. Now, this volume is done through programs electronically and the payouts are fractions of a cent.
This technology change has pushed out human brokers who still rely on the old fashioned way of trading out of the biz. Interestingly, she saw Jeff Zucker's comment "Analog dollars to digital pennies" through this lens. Technology provides huge advantages in costs & increasing production, but there are going to be some who are left out in the cold if they don't adapt in time. The benefactors change as tech changes.
I see this all the time when speaking with publishers. They conceptually want to adapt but they are afraid and the the people and organizations need to embrace the changes. A role inside the digital media organization that understands rapid change is Ad Operations this group has seen a massive shift from coding html on a page to serve an ad to now dynamically managing inventory across a frankenstein system of ad servers, order and yield management systems, data providers, rich media vendors, analytics, third-party ad networks and the list goes on. Digital media is looking more like the stock market every day and the trafficker is a lot like the broker of old, we now live in a data economy so the inventory analysts will run the business and those that are still hard coding ads to a page are long gone.
0
Maybe One of the Funniest Simpson's Ever
Posted by
Lawrence Allen
Labels:
George Simpson,
Media,
Tiger Woods
George Simpson writes a column once a week for Media Post in an attempt to take a lighthearted look at media and advertising. This weeks column titled Now I'm The Grandest Tiger In The Jungle.was regarding Tiger Woods of course and maybe George's funniest yet. His witty article highlights how there was not a single media outlet that could keep their hands off the story. Although, there wasn't really a story there at all, but our friends in the media found a way to make one. Is this sensational strategy working to build audience value?
John Stewart of the Daily Show also couldn't stay away either. He put together a highlights reel that shows just how pathetic the media is.
If this is what traditional news outlets think hard news is then it is obvious why they are struggling to keep audiences, grow their business and turn a profit.
Read more
John Stewart of the Daily Show also couldn't stay away either. He put together a highlights reel that shows just how pathetic the media is.
If this is what traditional news outlets think hard news is then it is obvious why they are struggling to keep audiences, grow their business and turn a profit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
